Friday, February 2, 2018

Georgia: The National Self (and the "other")

Personally, I believe the term “national identity” refers to a single nation’s unique characteristics derived from its culture that define who they are. Perhaps a specific traditional music, language, dance, or cooking dish gives them a sense of pride in themselves as a nation compared to other countries across the world. National identity also tends to be alongside a comparison of a separate country, usually bordering the nation. This “other” country is a very important part in distinguishing a country’s national identity.
The country of Georgia has built an extremely strong national identity, as they are one of the oldest countries in the world, starting their creation in the year 300 B.C (CIA World Factbook, 2017a). Although the country of Georgia can at times be confused with the country in the United States, or just completely forgotten about, Georgians are loud and proud of where they come from.
Language is a very prevalent and unique characteristic in the country of Georgia. The official language of Georgia is Georgian, which 87.6% of the population speak (CIA World Factbook, 2017b). An incredible feature of Georgian is that it is one of the only languages in the world to have no influence by any European or Asian language. This very complicated and complex language has 3 alphabets including: Asomtavruli, Nuskhuri and Mkhedruli. This language has stood through centuries upon centuries of intruders coming in and out of the country, and the fact that the language has stayed the same through all those years proves the strength and pride Georgia has for its history.
Another example of Georgians’ national identity is their religion. 83.4% of Georgians are Orthodox, which happens to be the official religion of the country (CIA World Factbook, 2017b). This follows with 10.7% Muslims, which can be traced back to the Azerbaijanian community in the country (CIA World Factbook, 2017b). Being religious is an extremely important moral throughout the country of Georgia. Georgia was one of the first countries in the world to adopt the religion of Christianity in 327 C.E., as it is known that Jesus has done his workings around this area of the world (CIA World Factbook, 2017b).
A final example of Georgia’s national identity is their traditional musical culture. Through the art of singing, Georgians showcase their exquisite talent. The traditional music genre is known as polyphonic singing. Although polyphonic singing can be heard all over the world, the country of Georgia was one of the first to adopt this genre of music (Ivane Javakhishvili, 2010). The polyphonic genre of music is defined as, “a style of musical composition employing two or more simultaneous but relatively independent melodic lines” (Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary, 1993).
In terms of the “other” nation that has heavily influenced Georgian culture, the answer is a bit complicated. Although many people know about the invasion of Russia into Ukraine, many are not very knowledgeable of the invasion of Russia into Georgia or the history between these two countries. In 1991, Georgia declared independence from the Soviet Union, but two regions in Georgia, known as South Ossetia and Abkhazia, were not in favor of this decision (BBC Monitoring, 2017a). In 1992 South Ossetia, along with Abkhazia in 1999, declared independence from the country of Georgia because of said disagreement (BBC Monitoring, 2017b, 2017c). Although these regions both declared themselves independent in the late 1990s, only a few countries around the world, including Russia, see them as separate from Georgia (BBC Monitoring, 2017c). Therefore, when referring to these areas, the term “autonomous breakaway regions of Georgia” is usually preferred.  In August of 2008, Russia sent many explosives and soldiers into Georgia wanting to “protect” South Ossetia due to Russia’s accusation of Georgia’s “aggression against South Ossetia (Peter Roudik, 2015). For five days in August 2008, there were incredible amounts of war and violence throughout the region of South Ossetia and the Georgian borders surrounding it (BBC Monitoring, 2017c). Although the UN tried to investigate this attack, they were removed from the area due to Russia’s veto (CNN Library, 2017). Today, people are still trying to find out what caused Russia’s attack and why the war really started in the first place.
In Anna Triandafyllidou’s work, National Identity and the ‘Other’, she brings up the idea of two types of “others” known as the significant internal and external “others”. Triandafyllidou (1998), defines an external “other” as, “those that form a separate political system” (p. 600). Later she states how an external significant other can also be defined as another threating or non-threatening nation. The internal significant “other” is one who “belong to the same political entity with the ingroup” (Triandafyllidou, 1998). Further on, Triandafyllidou (1998), describes that an internal significant other can be as simple as a group with different cultural beliefs including “language, traditions and myths from origin” (p.601).
Triandafyllidou’s idea on significant external and internal “others” directly correlates to the two autonomous breakaway regions of Georgia: South Ossetia and Abkhazia. I believe these two breakaway regions would be classified underneath the internal significant other who is a, “small nation existing within a larger multinational state” or in more simpler terms, a nation within a larger nation (Triandafyllidou, 602). What’s a bit strange about the situation is that most of the world doesn’t see these two regions as their own country, therefore still placing them underneath the internal significant ‘other’ category instead of an external significant ‘other’.
The country of Russia could also be placed under the category of external significant ‘other’, but personally, I would not consider them an “other” that heavily influenced the cultural community. Although Georgia did break away from the Soviet Union in the early 1990s and the two countries did have a war in 2008, Russia has had no direct influence into Georgian’s culture. Yes, Russia did fight for the South Ossetian people, but the official boundary hasn’t changed to the rest of the world. Therefore, in my opinion, Russia did not profoundly affect Georgia.
Although Georgia has recently been at war, surprisingly there haven’t been any influences through linguistic, musical, or religious traditions to the country of Georgia from both internal significant others: South Ossetia and Abkhazia or external significant other: Russia. Georgia has once again stuck to its roots, even through hardship, and kept the people and their customs sacred. Even though Georgia might have some disagreements with each significant other, Georgia’s national identity has never been influenced or wavered by any country, and that is something to be proud of.

Word Count (1082)










Works cited:
BBC Monitoring, (2017a). Georgia Country Profile. BBC News. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-17301647
BBC Monitoring, (2017b). Abkhazia Profile. BBC News. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-18175030
BBC Monitoring, (2017c). South Ossetia Profile. BBC News. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-18269210
CIA World Factbook (2017a). Introduction. Georgia.
CIA World Factbook (2017b). People and Society. Georgia.
CNN Library (2017). 2008 Georgia Russia Conflict Fast Facts. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2014/03/13/world/europe/2008-georgia-russia-conflict/index.html
Ivane Javakhishvili (2010). The views and theories of Georgian authors. In: Rusudan Tsurtsumua and Joseph Jordania (editors), Echoes from Georgia: Seventeen Arguments on Georgian Polyphony (collection of essays). New York: Nova Science, pg 19-34.
Merriam-Webster's collegiate dictionary (10th ed.).(1993). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster. Definition: Polyphony
Peter Roudik (2015). “Russian Federation: Legal Aspects of War in Georgia. Library of Congress. Retrieved from https://www.loc.gov/law/help/legal-aspects-of-war/russian-georgia-war.php
Triandafyllidou, Anna (1998). National identity and the 'other'. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(4), 593-612. Retrived from http://login.proxy.seattleu.edu/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.proxy.seattleu.edu/docview/210167159?accountid=28598


No comments:

Post a Comment